Arguements against the glp critics that the weight loss will not be permanent
- joelstephen1940
- Jul 3
- 2 min read
Counterarguments Against GLP-1 Critics: Why Weight Loss Can Be Permanent?

Critics often claim that GLP-1 agonists (like semaglutide and tirzepatide) only provide temporary weight loss, arguing that patients regain weight after stopping the medication. While maintenance requires effort, here’s how to refute the skepticism with science and strategy:
1. "People Regain Weight After Stopping—Proof It Doesn’t Work Long-Term!"
Counterargument:
Obesity is a chronic disease—just like hypertension or diabetes, it often requires long-term management.
Studies show that patients who continue GLP-1 therapy (even at lower doses) maintain weight loss better than those who quit entirely (STEP 5 trial, SURMOUNT-4).
Lifestyle integration is key—those who use the medication as a tool to adopt healthier habits (mindful eating, exercise) sustain results.
Key Point: "Would you expect a diabetic to stay controlled after stopping insulin? No. The same logic applies here."
2. "It’s Just Water Weight or Muscle Loss, Not Real Fat Loss!"
Counterargument:
DEXA scans & clinical trials confirm that GLP-1s primarily reduce fat mass, especially visceral fat (the dangerous kind around organs).
Muscle loss can be mitigated with:
Protein-rich diets (1g per pound of goal weight)
Resistance training (2-3x/week)
Peptide support (e.g., CJC-1295/Ipamorelin for muscle retention)
Key Point: "The data shows fat loss dominates—but smart nutrition and exercise optimize body composition."
3. "It’s a Crutch—You Need Willpower, Not a Shot!"
Counterargument:
Obesity is biologically driven—hormones (leptin, ghrelin), genetics, and metabolic adaptation sabotage "willpower."
GLP-1s rebalance hunger signals, making sustainable habits easier to maintain.
Spiritual/mental growth analogy: Just as meditation apps help train the mind, GLP-1s help retrain the body’s set point.
Key Point: "Calling it a ‘crutch’ is like calling glasses a cheat for poor eyesight—it’s medical therapy."
4. "The Weight Always Comes Back—See Ozempic ‘Rebound’ Stories!"
Counterargument:
"Rebound" happens with abrupt stops—tapering + lifestyle locks in results.
Maintenance dosing works: Studies show low-dose continuation (~⅓ original dose) prevents regain.
Behavioral coaching matters: Patients who work on habit change during treatment keep weight off.
Key Point: "The medication gives you a metabolic reset—but you have to build on it."
5. "It’s Not Natural—You Should Just Diet and Exercise!"
Counterargument:
"Natural" doesn’t mean better—many life-saving drugs (e.g., insulin, statins) are bioidentical or synthetic.
Diet/exercise alone fail most long-term—95% of people regain lost weight without additional tools.
GLP-1s mimic natural hormones (like the GLP-1 we produce after meals).
Key Point: "If your body’s signals are broken, sometimes you need a repair tool."
6. "You’ll Be on It Forever—That’s Dangerous!"
Counterargument:
Long-term use is well-tolerated—data shows safety over years (similar to metformin or thyroid meds).
Maintenance dosing reduces risks—many patients lower doses after hitting goals.
Compare to alternatives: Obesity’s risks (diabetes, heart disease) far outweigh medication risks.
Key Point: "Forever’ is only scary if the alternative is worse."
The Bigger Picture: How to Make It Permanent
For lasting results, combine GLP-1s with:
Metabolic rehab (strength training, NEAT exercise)
Mindful eating (protein focus, whole foods)
Peptide support (e.g., Tesamorelin for belly fat, AOD9604 for metabolic flexibility)
Mental/spiritual work (stress management, self-image coaching)
Final Thought:
"Permanent weight loss isn’t about the drug alone—it’s about using the drug to rebuild a sustainable biology."
"Curious about temporary or permanent weight loss? Kindly join us here at BetterlifeBioscience to get updated on events".
コメント